Honeycomb Core Density and Thermal Conductivity

Last updated:

Using the following tool, you can estimate the effective density and thermal conductivity of the honeycomb core. Please enter the dimensions of the honeycomb core and set the density and thermal conductivity of the core material.

honeycomb-conductivity-1 Figure 1: Honeycomb Core Dimensions.

Evaluation Method for Honeycomb Core Effective Properties

In aerospace applications, honeycomb panels are often used because of their lightweight and high-stiffness characteristics. Regarding the thermal characteristics, honeycomb panels typically have low thermal conductivity and exhibit anisotropic behavior. When performing system thermal analysis of a spacecraft, details of the honeycomb core geometry cannot be included in the model. Thus, effective properties such as density and thermal conductivity must be estimated and incorporated into the model as material parameters.

Using the core dimensions and material properties, the effective density and thermal conductivity of the honeycomb core can be estimated [1]. We assume that the core shape is a regular hexagon as shown in Figure 1, but the basic idea remains the same for other core geometries. The honeycomb core is made by shaping and bonding sheet materials, and so the wall thickness varies with direction.

Regarding the effective density ρeff\rho_\mathrm{eff}, we evaluate the area ratio of the core material in the horizontal cross-section.

Reference Area:S2×(S23+S3)=34S2\begin{equation} \mathrm{Reference~Area:}\quad \frac{S}{2} \times \left( \frac{S}{2\sqrt{3}} + \frac{S}{\sqrt{3}} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}S^2 \end{equation} Core Material Area:δ×(S3+S3)=23Sδ\begin{equation} \mathrm{Core~Material~Area:}\quad \delta \times \left( \frac{S}{\sqrt{3}} + \frac{S}{\sqrt{3}} \right) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}S\delta \end{equation} ρeff=23Sδ×ρ34S2=8δρ3S\begin{equation} \rho_\mathrm{eff} = \frac{\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}S\delta \times \rho}{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}S^2} = \frac{8\delta \rho}{3S} \end{equation}

The effective thermal conductivity must be evaluated for each direction. For the thickness direction, the thermal conductivity is expressed in two ways: using the core material’s thermal conductivity kk and the effective thermal conductivity in the thickness direction kHk_H.

k×23Sδh=2kSδ3h[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k\times \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}S\delta}{h} = \frac{2kS\delta}{\sqrt{3}h}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation} kH×34S2h=3kHS24h[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k_H\times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}S^2}{h} = \frac{\sqrt{3}k_H S^2}{4h}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation}

Since these two expressions are equal, the effective thermal conductivity in the thickness direction kHk_H can be expressed as follows.

kH=83kδS\begin{equation} k_H = \frac{8}{3} \frac{k\delta}{S} \end{equation}

Effective thermal conductivities in the in-plane directions can be evaluated in the same way. The effective thermal conductivity in the L-direction can be expressed in the following two ways.

k×δh23S=3kδh2S[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k\times \delta h}{\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}S} = \frac{\sqrt{3}k\delta h}{2S}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation} kL×S2h32S=kLh3[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k_L\times \frac{S}{2}h}{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}S} = \frac{k_L h}{\sqrt{3}}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation}

Since these two expressions are equal, the effective thermal conductivity in the L-direction kLk_L can be expressed as follows.

kL=32kδS\begin{equation} k_L = \frac{3}{2} \frac{k\delta}{S} \end{equation}

Also, the effective thermal conductivity in the W-direction kWk_W can be expressed in the following two ways.

k×δh23S=3kδh2S[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k\times \delta h}{\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}S} = \frac{\sqrt{3}k\delta h}{2S}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation} kW×h(S23+S3)S=3kWh2[W/K]\begin{equation} \frac{k_W\times h\left(\frac{S}{2\sqrt{3}} + \frac{S}{\sqrt{3}} \right)}{S} = \frac{\sqrt{3}k_W h}{2}\quad[\mathrm{W/K}] \end{equation}

Equating these two expressions gives the effective thermal conductivity in the W-direction kWk_W as follows.

kW=kδS\begin{equation} k_W = \frac{k\delta}{S} \end{equation}

References

  1. David G. Gilmore, “Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook. Vol. 1: Fundamental Technologies”, The Aerospace Corporation Press, California, 2002, doi: 10.2514/4.989117

Related Articles

Derivation of the Hertz-Knudsen-Schrage Equation

By adding an average velocity to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, the Hertz-Knudsen Equation can be modified. This article derives the Hertz-Knudsen-Schrage Equation based on this assumption.

Standard Atmosphere (U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, ISA, ICAO)

U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, ISA (International Standard Atmosphere), ICAO Standard Atmosphere are well-known models that describe the variation of atmospheric properties such as temperature and pressure with altitude. This article explains the calculation methods for various atmospheric parameters based on these models.

Derivation of the Hertz-Knudsen Equation

Hertz-Knudsen Equation (also known as Hertz-Knudsen-Langmuir Equation) is a classical model for representing mass flux due to condensation and evaporation. In this article, we will derive the Hertz-Knudsen Equation starting from the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.